The High 15 Cities for Distant Staff in 2023
3 min read
Editor’s Observe: This story initially appeared on LawnStarter.
Freedom of location is without doubt one of the greatest perks of distant work. With a robust Wi-Fi connection, you might take Zoom calls from a beachside villa, a mountaintop chalet, or a garden chair in your yard.
That can assist you discover the optimum spot in your telecommuter life-style, LawnStarter ranked 2023’s Finest Cities for Distant Staff.
We in contrast cities primarily based on distant worker-friendliness components, similar to web high quality, value of dwelling, and entry to coworking areas.
Try our rating of the most effective cities for distant employees.
1. Plano, TX
- General Rating: 67.11
- Monetary Incentive Rank: 7
- Incomes Potential Rank: 19
- Workspace Rank: 6
- Connectivity Rank: 41
- Affordability Rank: 6
- Security Rank: 27
- Facilities Rank: 94
2. Frisco, TX
- General Rating: 67.02
- Monetary Incentive Rank: 7
- Incomes Potential Rank: 6
- Workspace Rank: 3
- Connectivity Rank: 108
- Affordability Rank: 2
- Security Rank: 5
- Facilities Rank: 146
3. Tampa, FL
- General Rating: 65.69
- Monetary Incentive Rank: 7
- Incomes Potential Rank: 55
- Workspace Rank: 11
- Connectivity Rank: 12
- Affordability Rank: 32
- Security Rank: 41
- Facilities Rank: 51
4. Atlanta, GA
- General Rating: 63.99
- Monetary Incentive Rank: 7
- Incomes Potential Rank: 31
- Workspace Rank: 10
- Connectivity Rank: 21
- Affordability Rank: 77
- Security Rank: 149
- Facilities Rank: 17
5. Seattle, WA
- General Rating: 63.48
- Monetary Incentive Rank: 7
- Incomes Potential Rank: 8
- Workspace Rank: 29
- Connectivity Rank: 10
- Affordability Rank: 113
- Security Rank: 180
- Facilities Rank: 78
6. Durham, NC
- General Rating: 63.26
- Monetary Incentive Rank: 7
- Incomes Potential Rank: 68
- Workspace Rank: 42
- Connectivity Rank: 4
- Affordability Rank: 61
- Security Rank: 163
- Facilities Rank: 69
7. Austin, TX
- General Rating: 63.06
- Monetary Incentive Rank: 7
- Incomes Potential Rank: 32
- Workspace Rank: 113
- Connectivity Rank: 13
- Affordability Rank: 36
- Security Rank: 135
- Facilities Rank: 9
8. Kansas Metropolis, MO
- General Rating: 62.55
- Monetary Incentive Rank: 7
- Incomes Potential Rank: 121
- Workspace Rank: 62
- Connectivity Rank: 3
- Affordability Rank: 29
- Security Rank: 180
- Facilities Rank: 182
9. Jacksonville, FL
- General Rating: 62.23
- Monetary Incentive Rank: 7
- Incomes Potential Rank: 135
- Workspace Rank: 114
- Connectivity Rank: 5
- Affordability Rank: 60
- Security Rank: 104
- Facilities Rank: 4
10. Charlotte, NC
- General Rating: 62.08
- Monetary Incentive Rank: 7
- Incomes Potential Rank: 47
- Workspace Rank: 52
- Connectivity Rank: 22
- Affordability Rank: 45
- Security Rank: 128
- Facilities Rank: 48
11. Raleigh, NC
- General Rating: 61.96
- Monetary Incentive Rank: 7
- Incomes Potential Rank: 51
- Workspace Rank: 61
- Connectivity Rank: 23
- Affordability Rank: 41
- Security Rank: 61
- Facilities Rank: 87
12. Houston, TX
- General Rating: 61.42
- Monetary Incentive Rank: 7
- Incomes Potential Rank: 104
- Workspace Rank: 83
- Connectivity Rank: 27
- Affordability Rank: 19
- Security Rank: 174
- Facilities Rank: 38
13. Nashville, TN
- General Rating: 61.39
- Monetary Incentive Rank: 7
- Incomes Potential Rank: 82
- Workspace Rank: 66
- Connectivity Rank: 15
- Affordability Rank: 65
- Security Rank: 174
- Facilities Rank: 25
14. Naperville, IL
- General Rating: 61.32
- Monetary Incentive Rank: 7
- Incomes Potential Rank: 7
- Workspace Rank: 4
- Connectivity Rank: 146
- Affordability Rank: 7
- Security Rank: 1
- Facilities Rank: 52
15. Dallas, TX
- General Rating: 61.30
- Monetary Incentive Rank: 7
- Incomes Potential Rank: 93
- Workspace Rank: 153
- Connectivity Rank: 7
- Affordability Rank: 51
- Security Rank: 149
- Facilities Rank: 10
Methodology
For every of the cities on this listing, we gathered publicly accessible information and components.
We then grouped these components into seven classes: Monetary Incentive, Incomes Potential, Workspace, Connectivity, Affordability, Security, and Facilities.
Subsequent, we calculated weighted scores for every metropolis in every class.
Lastly, we averaged the scores for every metropolis throughout all classes.
The town that earned the best common rating was ranked “Finest” (No. 1).
